[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev syntax change
From: |
Philip Webb |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev syntax change |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Mar 1999 00:57:18 -0500 (EST) |
990301 Jacob Poon wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Philip Webb wrote:
>> maybe you don't touch-type: up to the number keys is a natural movement,
>> but - & + are a stretch & + needs shifting:
> This is true if everybody uses US (or similar) keyboard layout. However,
> when using other keyboards (eg: Germany, Italy, Latin America),
> you do not need to hold the Shift key to access the '+' on typewriter keys.
yes, i've realised we're getting into an area with many personal variables.
> If you want to enter links quickly and frequently for navigating links,
> a better way is to put one hand on the keypad (for entering numbers),
> and another on the typewriter keys (to handle link type).
but that's not the touch-typing stance ...
> Actually, it is more of an algebraic issue than calculus one. :)
i hope i haven't misinterpreted your earlier message,
which appeared to drop support for 0+1g (if you ever supported it).
KD's point -- that 1+g & 1g+ can be valid simultaneously --
hopefully solves the problem for everyone: she or LE just have to do it.
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto