Re: lynx-dev patch to add description of extended INCLUDE syntax to

[dickey]

> 
> From: Vlad Harchev <address@hidden> 
> : 
> >in global lynx.cfg (and this line won't be implied by lynx) - only if 
> >sysadmin 
> >wish to include the user-specific conf. file, the line similar to given 
> >should 
> : 
> >mean). Ask Larry Virden what he think about it. 
> : 
>  
> I myself can't imagine putting an include for a user specified config file 
> into a global config file.  I can however imagine individual users using  
> includes to include certain site specific configuration files in cases where 
> users have access to providing their own configuration.  

It's unusual (an example doesn't come to mind readily, but Lynx is not unique).
The user include-file would normally shadow a system default file.  (But we
can do it better in 2.8.3).

> Larry W. Virden                 <URL: mailto:address@hidden> 

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey