lynx-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lynx-dev Re: [PATCH 2.8.4dev.10] Build on OS/2


From: Thomas Dickey
Subject: Re: lynx-dev Re: [PATCH 2.8.4dev.10] Build on OS/2
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 20:12:15 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 05:58:28PM -0400, Ilya Zakharevich wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 01:49:22AM -0400, Ilya Zakharevich wrote:
> > -.a-zA-Z:\\/*) #(vi OS/2 EMX
> > +.[a-zA-Z]:[\\/]*) #(vi OS/2 EMX
> 
> TD wrote:
> 
> TD> I'm using a separate copy of autoconf to handle OS/2 EMX for the time
> TD> being (will look at the newer autoconf versions if/when they manage to
> TD> make it work: 2.49a falls far short of that goal).
> 
> Why should it matter?  It is lynx who defines the macro CF_PATH_SYNTAX.
> Probably some creative quoting is needed there...

ok (I was thinking it was part of the builtins - up too late).
it's early so far today.

> > +
> > +chrtrans/makeuctb$x:
> > +   cd chrtrans; make makeuctb$x
> 
> TD> maybe - we already have this rule:
> 
> TD> do_chartrans_stuff:
> TD>         -cd chrtrans && $(MAKE) \
> 
> But chrtrans/makeuctb$x should be made dependent on do_chartrans_stuff then...

perhaps (making dependencies on symbolic targets doesn't always seem to
work well though - when I have problems I reduce it to the actual files)

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey <address@hidden>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com

; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]