[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: --enable-vertrace (Was Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev Wh
From: |
Frédéric L . W . Meunier |
Subject: |
Re: --enable-vertrace (Was Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd))) |
Date: |
Sun, 8 Feb 2004 18:56:00 -0200 |
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > > > > It would have to be expressed differently. The configure script is
> > > > > actually making a text substitution in the lynx_cfg.h file - not
> > > > > adding a -D option to the makefile. The usual approach to that is
> > > > > to add a chunk to userdefs.h, e.g.,
> > > > > #if defined(USE_VERTRACE) && !defined(LY_TRACELINE)
> > > > > #define LY_TRACELINE __LINE__
> > > > > #endif
> > > > >
> > > > > Then your makefile could define USE_VERTRACE.
> > Check http://www.pervalidus.net/cygwin/download/Borland/ .
> > Maybe I missed something.
>
> I see now - the chunk has to go in HTUtils.h before the ifdef for
> LY_TRACELINE, since userdefs.h is included at the end of HTUtils.h
>
> Doing that works (for me).
Thanks. For me too.
--
How to contact me - http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), (continued)
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/04
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/04
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/04
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Henry Nelson, 2004/02/04
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/04
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/05
- --enable-vertrace (Was Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd))), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/07
- Re: --enable-vertrace (Was Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd))), Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/07
- Re: --enable-vertrace (Was Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd))), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/07
- Re: --enable-vertrace (Was Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd))), Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/08
- Re: --enable-vertrace (Was Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd))),
Frédéric L . W . Meunier <=
- Re: --enable-vertrace (Was Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd))), Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/08
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Doug Kaufman, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Henry Nelson, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/05
- Re: mailing-list problem (Was Re: lynx-dev What happened to MINGW patch? (fwd)), Thomas Dickey, 2004/02/05