[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: .ONESHELL enhancement?
From: |
Boris Kolpackov |
Subject: |
Re: .ONESHELL enhancement? |
Date: |
Sun, 4 Oct 2009 08:59:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Hi David,
David Boyce <address@hidden> writes:
> Again, if it doesn't work for someone, they don't need to use it.
I don't like the idea that .ONESHELL will realistically only work
for specially-crafted makefiles (and that's where, I feel, it is
going). This way it becomes a feature for a "special interest" group.
I would much prefer it being smart enough to be able to work with a
wide range of existing build systems. Or, at least, issue warnings
for incompatible constructs so that a build system can be fixed.
Boris
--
Boris Kolpackov, Code Synthesis Tools http://codesynthesis.com/~boris/blog
Open-source XML data binding for C++: http://codesynthesis.com/products/xsd
XML data binding for embedded systems: http://codesynthesis.com/products/xsde
- Re: .ONESHELL enhancement?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/10/03
- Re: .ONESHELL enhancement?, David Boyce, 2009/10/03
- Re: .ONESHELL enhancement?,
Boris Kolpackov <=
- Re: .ONESHELL enhancement?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/10/04
- Re: .ONESHELL enhancement?, David Boyce, 2009/10/04
- Re: .ONESHELL enhancement?, Paul Smith, 2009/10/04
- Re: .ONESHELL enhancement?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/10/05
- Re: .ONESHELL enhancement?, Matt McCutchen, 2009/10/05
- Re: .ONESHELL enhancement?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/10/05
- Re: .ONESHELL enhancement?, Matt McCutchen, 2009/10/05
- Re: .ONESHELL enhancement?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/10/07
Re: .ONESHELL enhancement?, Matt McCutchen, 2009/10/04