address@hidden: Re: [Mldonkey-users] Is mldonkey completely banned from edonkey network?]

[Ivo]

This got sent to me personally instead of the list again. Somebody fix the
mailinglist already. :)

----- Forwarded message from MLdonkey <address@hidden> -----

From: MLdonkey <address@hidden>
To: Ivo <address@hidden>
Reply-To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Mldonkey-users] Is mldonkey completely banned from edonkey 
network?
Envelope-to: address@hidden


>  > What about a feature-freeze (especially this multi-net stuff) and
>  > a further investigation of the real goals/problems? A well
>  > behaving and good performing edonkey-client?
>  
>  Well, a thing to consider is that there is (in my eyes) not a
>  stable mldonkey release yet and it's still under heavy
>  development. But a feature-freeze seems like a very good idea to
>  me.

I will release 2.00 this week as soon as upload on Overnet is working
correctly. Binaries will be edonkey+overnet only, since upload is not
implemented on other nets.

>  Clean everything up and make it stable. Or are there milestones
>  that need to be reached? Who or what dictates where mldonkey
>  development is going? If it's just MLDonkey's mind, then I suggest
>  the devteam does some organizing.

What dictates mldonkey development ? I don't know. Bug reports ?
Feature requests ? Patches ? Probably all of them ... but not me !

- MLDonkey

----- End forwarded message -----