Re: [Modcaml] ld error when compiling

[Robert Fischer]

Cool.  Then I'm just going to roll with my current approach.

~~ Robert.

On Apr 23, 2008, at 1:16 PM, Richard Jones wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 01:12:29PM -0500, Robert Fischer wrote:
> > Yeah, that's what it's called, but the wiki just called it
> > "libcamlrun.so", and that was what was referenced in the
> > Makefile.config, so I went with that.  Is the only consequence of
> > calling it libcamlrun.so a performance hit due to the dynamic link,  
> > or
> > should I go back and try this approach?
>
> The name shouldn't make any difference.
>
> There is a (small) performance penalty from using a shared library
> over a static library, but on x86-64 you don't have any choice in the
> matter because of shortcomings in the Linux linker.
>
> Rich.
>
> --
> Richard Jones
> Red Hat
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Modcaml mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/modcaml