Re: new control.c

[rory]

> Rory Toma <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Ah, yes, using exist_daemon will work better than arbitralily
>> setting constants.
>
> Maybe you can use exist_daemon directly inside functions so you do not
> have to expose (int daemon) in the parameter list?

It seems that validate.c was set up to originally call the start function
w/o checking for a daemon, so I preserved this behavior, which is the main
reason for having it.>
>> And I see you fixed the doxygen stuff, which I haven't used and took a
>> wild guess at.
>
> I see that it needs more fixing, since some parameters are named
> wrong, you fix?
>
I'll take a look and double check.

>
> --
> Jan-Henrik Haukeland
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> monit-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-dev