Re: CPU usage configuration report in cervlet

[Jan-Henrik Haukeland]

Martin Pala <address@hidden> writes:

> I have three little issues:
> 
> 1.) *
> What tabout to synchronize it? I think it will be better to not report
> actual cycles count, so cervlet will give:
> 
> 
> CPU usage limit    If greater than 2.0% for 5 cycle(s) then alert

Agree

> 2.) what about making start+stop programs in passive mode optional?
> Currently if they aren't defined, monit won't monitor the service. I
> think it will be usefull to allow passive mode monitoring live without
> start+stop definition. It will be needed also to print information in
> the case that star/stop program wasn't defined  in cervlet and
> terminal mode if user will try to start/stop process via monit's httpd
> or by "monit start".

The start/stop programs have always been optional, unless I have
missed something checked in lately!? If they are not optional I, of
course, vote for them to become optional again.

> 3.) Last question is regarded to cevlet and terminal process
> information order - what about to move mailinglist information to the
> end of process info? If you few contacts, important informations such
> as protocol test are at the end of the list, which as maybe not
> good. I think that we should move all these informations above process
> mailing list, so we can have for example:

Agree again :)

You fix?

-- 
Jan-Henrik Haukeland