Re: SNMP

[Jan-Henrik Haukeland]

Martin Pala <address@hidden> writes:

> Yeah, we spoke about SNMP traps in the past - it was on the TODO too :) 

We changed it (tentatively) to using web-services via the SOAP
interface instead, but maybe it's not mutually exclusive?

> I still think it could be useful in lot of cases (we use
> Netcool/Infovista for monitoring, which is able as well as meny
> other NMS to display SNMP traps).

I know very little about SNMP but from what I have read it looks
pretty useful, particularly with a program like monit. 

> Rory Toma wrote:
> 
> >So, I'm neck deep in snmp right now, and it occurred to me how much
> >easier my job would be if monit supported snmp, both from a trap
> >perspective (as an alert, etc) and also providing info a la "monit
> >status"

-- 
Jan-Henrik Haukeland