On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Martin Pala wrote:
You are right Christian - the result of the election was realy strange
:) I'm neutral in this question not because of try to make pleasure for
someone, but just because i'm not against it as well as i don't think
that it is 'must have' feature.
Probably Jan's decision is good conclusion for the election - we have 4
votes => (0+0+0+1)/4 = 1/4 which is too low for change. What about take
care about elections so, that the quotient of the election which equals
to votes_summary/electors_count must be >=0.5 to succeed? In can solve
similar situations well.
Martin
Or we do it like it like the jakarta voting. We say we need at least
two "+1" votes and more "+1" votes then "-1" votes. And for major
decisions we need at least two "+1" votes and no "-1" votes.
Christian