monit-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PATCH : Add Process to validate when started manually


From: Martin Pala
Subject: Re: PATCH : Add Process to validate when started manually
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 18:24:26 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021226 Debian/1.2.1-9

Jan-Henrik Haukeland wrote:

Rory Toma <address@hidden> writes:

Let me know what pending things I need to be working on. I've got
about 1-2 more weeks of not working on monit, then I'll be back.

At the moment we have only the following in the pipeline:

1) check device/file/directory Responsible: Martin

2) Reload monit on sighup only ++ as recently discussed on this list
   Responsible: Jan-Henrik

As soon as this is done we have a 3.2 release.

If you have any new ideas and/or functionality to suggest please do :)

Futher down the pipeline we have more major stuff which are listed in
this page: http://www.tildeslash.com/monit/next.html

I though about one extension - in the case of unaccesible SMTP service, monit will not send alarm message. Probably it would be better to spool these messages and send them as soon as the SMTP service starts responding again. It could be possible to define two or more SMTP servers for monit alarms as well (in the case of failure, monit could try next one from the list, etc.)

I didn't think about implementation "in deep" yet, but it could have next positives for monit - we could avoid sleep that monit does when restarting services => monit acceleration.

What about it?

Cheers,
Martin








reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]