Re: Status 4.0

[Rory Toma]

The only thing I have left to do is to check the new features. I don't
think I'll be able to get at that this week, though.

On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 16:29, Jan-Henrik Haukeland wrote:
> Christian Hopp <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Martin Pala wrote:
> >
> >> I think it is not needed to release public beta - in the case that we
> >> agree that the code is complete, we can do private beta (freeze the
> >> code) and test it for example for one week. If we will find some bugs,
> >> we will fix it and repeat beta testing with new candidate. As soon as
> >> there will not be any urgent issue (we can build TODO list of non-urgent
> >> issues), we can decide whether to release or not. Just my 2 cents ...
> >> maybe this is too expensive for us (we all are busy of some other work 
> >> too).
> >>
> >> Martin
> >
> > I agree.  We do simply announce a freeze on the general list.  And we do
> > as many test on as many platforms as possible.  Maybe it is possible to do
> > it organized.  Everyone doing successful (or non successful) test simply
> > lists the system and the tested features.  So we can easy list what
> > features or os/feature combination haven't been tested yet.
> 
> Okay, sounds like a plausible plan. Still, I would like to try and
> release a beta to the general list when we freeze, it does not hurt
> and may even lead to some feedback. We need some pressure, so I
> suggest that we announce the freeze this Friday (29. August).
> Depending on Martin and Rory's status, of course. (Also I need to fix
> the monit.pod and other doc, but it should be ready to Friday).
> 
> Agree?
> 
> Ps. Christian, do you have time to check out the line number bug in l.l?
-- 
Rory Toma               address@hidden
VP of Run Level 9       http://www.trs80.net
Digeo Digital           http://www.digeo.com

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part