[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] automate stdio, really
From: |
Thomas Moschny |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] automate stdio, really |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:10:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.4 |
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 20:48, Chad Walstrom wrote:
> Steven Grimm <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Perhaps it's worth revisiting this idea from Larry Hastings last year?
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg01913.html
>
> Since we're revisiting it, I want to point out Graydon's reply
> regarding I/O formats:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg01927.html
Ok, I'm not going to cite it, but if you're at it, you definitely should read
Nathaniel's response to that as well.
The basic point of views still remain the same today :) Different people have
different expectations/needs on how to interface the monotone core. Therefore
all those interfaces (cmdline gui, automate/list for shell script usage,
stdio for frontends) do have their right to exist. However, we should try to
find out what the core functionality is that is needed by all these
interfaces.
--
Thomas Moschny <address@hidden>
- Re: [Monotone-devel] automate stdio, really, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] automate stdio, really, Timothy Brownawell, 2006/08/30
- Re: [Monotone-devel] automate stdio, really, Thomas Moschny, 2006/08/30
- Re: [Monotone-devel] automate stdio, really, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/30
- Re: [Monotone-devel] automate stdio, really, Steven Grimm, 2006/08/30