[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] Re: Release
From: |
Bruce Stephens |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] Re: Release |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:26:01 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.94 (gnu/linux) |
William Uther <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
> Can there be an "ignore this revision" cert? It would be like a
> testresult cert only it would cause monotone to ignore that
> revision.
That's much what I had in mind, yes.
That would support other things too (those things that people use
git's "rebase" for).
>> In this case the revision's now an ancestor of all the heads, so we're
>> stuck with it.
>
> This is monotone! mtn up -r the revision you want to make a new head
> from, and then commit from there.
Well, sure. But (as things are now) then you'd be unable to propagate
to or from net.venge.monotone, and in general mtn would winge all the
time about the unmerged heads.
So what are the arguments against such a feature?
[...]
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Release, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Release, Thomas Keller, 2007/02/27
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Release, Bruce Stephens, 2007/02/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Release, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2007/02/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Release, Thomas Keller, 2007/02/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Release, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2007/02/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Release, Thomas Keller, 2007/02/27
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Release, Bruce Stephens, 2007/02/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Release, Thomas Keller, 2007/02/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Release, William Uther, 2007/02/27
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Release,
Bruce Stephens <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Release, Thomas Moschny, 2007/02/27
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Release, Bruce Stephens, 2007/02/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Release, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2007/02/27
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Release, Bruce Stephens, 2007/02/27