[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] mtn log with -b?
From: |
Nathaniel Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] mtn log with -b? |
Date: |
Wed, 30 May 2007 01:07:27 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 01:37:01PM +1000, William Uther wrote:
> Well, yes and no. You've solved the immediate problem, but I still
> think the question is a valid one: Why isn't a -b <branch> argument
> to mtn log a synonym for -r h:<branch>?
Because -b consistently means something else (i.e., pretends that the
current workspace is actually in branch <whatever> for purposes of the
current command). However, this is stupid, because everyone always
expects it to mean different particular things for every command
(checkout, log, diff, etc. etc.). This is why I keep arguing for
tearing it out entirely... :-)
-- Nathaniel
--
"The problem...is that sets have a very limited range of
activities -- they can't carry pianos, for example, nor drink
beer."