Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone

[Thomas Moschny]

On Monday 28 January 2008, Graydon Hoare wrote:
> I think it's a good branch as they go in this sort of thing. I just ran
> out of interest.

Sorry to hear that, but that's life, it seems.

> It contains a variety of interrelated new code. Anyone 
> else is welcome to pick it up of course.

> The changes are, primarily: [...]
>    - a sketch of the long-planned upgrade to certificates

Can you explain that a bit? Is this related to the idea of creating combined 
certs consisting of a author/date/msg/branch tuple?

- Thomas

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.