[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone
From: |
hendrik |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:57:16 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 09:30:24AM -0800, address@hidden wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 05:04:33PM +0100, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
>
> > Thomas Keller wrote:
> > >So where lacks monotone the most?
Lets make an entry in the dream-on category:
I miss the ability to merge revisions to tree-structured files while
guaranteeing that tree structure remains properly nested.
(what kinds of tree structures? Well, XML comes to mind because
it's standard; indented text comes to mind because there's so
much of it. Things with brackets also, but maybe I'm getting
greedy here :-) This could be done with syntax plugins for
various file types. There might be other uses for such plugins)
I don't expect anyone to provide this this anytime soon, and as far as I
know, no revision management system does this.
(but would it be useful if monotone were to be able to merge C files
without violating statement nesting? Or considering it a merge conflict
if it were inevitable?)
-- hendrik
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, (continued)
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, Ethan Blanton, 2008/01/28
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, Jack Lloyd, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, Timothy Brownawell, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, Jack Lloyd, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, hendrik, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, Patrick Georgi, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, Nathaniel Smith, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, Nuno Lucas, 2008/01/29
[Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Boris, 2008/01/31