|
From: | Markus Wanner |
Subject: | Re: [Monotone-devel] netsync flag day justifies bumping version number to 1.0 |
Date: | Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:31:10 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090706) |
Hi Zack Weinberg wrote: > What I think this calls for is a new cert type, which I'm going to > call "voucher". A voucher cert places a new-form signature on a > particular set of old-form certs for a revision. The data I think we > need to sign is > > revision_id || ( cert_hash || old_keypair_id || new_keypair_hash )* All of this reminds me of the atomic cert (or super cert) thingie. Wouldn't that be the absolute perfect combination for a common flag day? Well, despite the fact that we don't have atomic certs implemented... :-( Regards Markus Wanner
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |