[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] mingw-instructions
From: |
Thomas Keller |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] mingw-instructions |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Jan 2011 23:59:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; de; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101129 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
Am 08.01.11 12:54, schrieb Stephen Leake:
> http://wiki.monotone.ca/RoadMap/ has an entry:
>
> Split INSTALL by platform and update it | n/a |
> `net.venge.monotone{,.mingw-instructions}` | started |
>
> However, the mingw-instructions branch is more about upgrading to a
> newer version of the MinGW tools; splitting INSTALL is already done, on
> the main branch.
Right, only a few minor things are missing:
1) we should append a proper extension to that file and name it proper,
for example *.txt
2) we might think about converting it to DOS line endings, just to make
it look "proper" in the still-default text editor notepad
Finally I'm still unsure if we want to keep all these install files in
the main directory or under doc/ or install/ or whatever.
> I suggest we change this line to 'upgrade to newer MinGW tools'.
Feel free to do that.
> Note that main/INSTALL_windows_native says:
>
> The versions given here were used to build the current release of
> monontone.
>
> mingw-instructions changes that to:
>
> The versions given here may not be exactly the same versions as used
> to build the current release of monontone.
>
> Do we want to establish a policy of 'official mingw versions for mtn
> releases"?
>
> If so, I suggest we move 'upgrade to new MinGW' to after 1.0, since
> there is lots of other work to do (ie, I'd rather not spend time trying
> the new MinGW stuff).
>
> Having an official MinGW version list is useful in the case of
> MinGW-version dependent bugs. This has happened in the past, with
> internationalization.
>
> If we don't care about official versions of MinGW tools (which would be
> difficult to enforce), then it doesn't really matter whether this is in
> 1.0 or not.
I'm not into mingw and cannot say much about that, but in general we
have the same problems on other platforms as well, i.e. a new version of
a distro comes out and our "Debian" or "Fedora" instructions are
outdated because some package name or dependency changed. And I don't
think we actually want to support _every_ version of _every_ distro
where monotone can eventually be built on.
What we can see here is also that installation instructions are never
really complete nor 100% perfectly working, so a general disclaimer like
the one you stated above might be the way to go (or even something more
general like "we tested this with release so-and-so last time,
everything might have changed in the meantime").
Thomas.
--
GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | address@hidden | http://thomaskeller.biz
Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Monotone-devel] mingw-instructions, Stephen Leake, 2011/01/08
- Re: [Monotone-devel] mingw-instructions,
Thomas Keller <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] mingw-instructions, Stephen Leake, 2011/01/08
- Re: [Monotone-devel] mingw-instructions, Timothy Brownawell, 2011/01/08
- Re: [Monotone-devel] mingw-instructions, Stephen Leake, 2011/01/09
- Re: [Monotone-devel] mingw-instructions, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/09
- Re: [Monotone-devel] mingw-instructions, Stephen Leake, 2011/01/09
- Re: [Monotone-devel] mingw-instructions, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/09
- Re: [Monotone-devel] mingw-instructions, Timothy Brownawell, 2011/01/09
- Re: [Monotone-devel] mingw-instructions, Stephen Leake, 2011/01/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] mingw-instructions, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] mingw-instructions, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/09