[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11
From: |
Thomas Keller |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11 |
Date: |
Tue, 13 May 2014 09:08:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Postbox 3.0.9 (Macintosh/20140129) |
Hi Markus!
Markus Wanner schrieb:
> Obviously, the former offers little benefit: We could possibly add minor
> #ifdef'd optimizations. For example using perfect forwarding and move
> constructors to avoid some copying if C++11 is used.
>
> The latter seems much more interesting, but is a much heftier change as
> well. Before I proceed with that branch, I'd like to get some feedback
> and opinions.
Since I'm not developing with C++ anymore on a daily basis, would you
mind to give guys like me some examples / judgement why monotone should
switch to C++11? I could think of having less code in monotone because
more is taken care of already in the stdlib, but some examples would be
nice.
Thanks!
Thomas.
--
GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | address@hidden | http://thomaskeller.biz
Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11,
Thomas Keller <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Hendrik Boom, 2014/05/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, J Decker, 2014/05/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Hendrik Boom, 2014/05/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Stephen Leake, 2014/05/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Jack Lloyd, 2014/05/20
- Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11, Markus Wanner, 2014/05/16