monotone-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11


From: Thomas Keller
Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] C++11
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 09:08:01 +0200
User-agent: Postbox 3.0.9 (Macintosh/20140129)

Hi Markus!

Markus Wanner schrieb:
> Obviously, the former offers little benefit: We could possibly add minor
> #ifdef'd optimizations. For example using perfect forwarding and move
> constructors to avoid some copying if C++11 is used.
> 
> The latter seems much more interesting, but is a much heftier change as
> well. Before I proceed with that branch, I'd like to get some feedback
> and opinions.

Since I'm not developing with C++ anymore on a daily basis, would you
mind to give guys like me some examples / judgement why monotone should
switch to C++11? I could think of having less code in monotone because
more is taken care of already in the stdlib, but some examples would be
nice.

Thanks!
Thomas.

-- 
GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | address@hidden | http://thomaskeller.biz
Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]