Re: [Nano-devel] another minor patch update

[David Benbennick]

On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 06:10:08PM -0700, David Lawrence Ramsey wrote:
> i. e. changing some static functions back to non-static

You've changed all of them.  Is there something wrong with static
functions?  The static keyword signals that the function is local,
specialized.  Using static when possible helps encapsulate the code.


There is an off-by-one bug in do_wrap(), that means it fails to wrap
a line that is exactly one character too wide.  The attached patch fixes
this problem.

Also, in nano.c,v 1.267 DLR added a fix for checking spelling with the
alternate speller with the mark set.  Then in v 1.270 I foolishly took
that fix out.  Sorry.  The attached patch adds it back.

nanospel.patch
Description: Text document

pgpVhRlR9TWMI.pgp
Description: PGP signature