[Nano-devel] nanobits3.patch committed

[David Lawrence Ramsey]

After getting the ok from Chris, I've committed
nanobits3.patch.  The only change from the last version is
that all static functions are now non-static.

I asked Chris off-list about the static-functions issue;
this was his reply (quoted w/permission):

On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 06:50:04AM -0700, Chris Allegretta wrote: 
>Re: statics, I hate them.  I don't think the whole program
>should be static, nor should everything be inline.  I think the code
>gets very hard on the eyes and isn't worth the possibility of confusing
>the compiler (I can't imagine making a large portion of the code static
>is a good idea).  So if the tradeoff is everything static or nothing
>static, I'll take nothing static in a second.

Note that with nanobits3 applied, for consistency,
regcomp() calls in future patches should have
REG_EXTENDED set.


_____________________________________________________________
Sluggy.Net: The Sluggy Freelance Community!

_____________________________________________________________
Promote your group and strengthen ties to your members with address@hidden by 
Everyone.net  http://www.everyone.net/?btn=tag