Re: [Nano-devel] nanobits3.patch committed

[Chris Allegretta]

On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:49:49PM -0400, David Benbennick wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 05:11:25AM -0700, Chris Allegretta wrote:
> > ... I'd rather not see a large chunk of the code become static. ...
> > 
> > ... let me know what you think about this.
> 
> Okay, no more static functions.
> 
> I wonder if it is a good idea to include prototypes in proto.h for all
> non-static functions?  As the code now stands, I could add a function
> named print1opt to any source file other than nano.c.  There are no
> compiler errors, but the linker bombs.  By having a prototype for nano.c's
> version of print1opt, the problem would be caught by the compiler.

This is a very good idea.  It would unpleasant work to do, but if
no one else does I will do it, assuming I have free time again in the 
near future.  

Chris A
-- 
Chris Allegretta        http://www.asty.org

"Share and Enjoy" - Douglas Adams, 1952 - 2001