Re: [Nano-devel] nanomiscbugs2 update

[David Lawrence Ramsey]

--- David Lawrence Ramsey <address@hidden> wrote:
>--- Chris Allegretta <address@hidden> wrote:

<snip>

>>I would tend to agree.  I also like testing for == 0 or !=0 as well, 
>>just because it makes the program easier to read (I absolutely hate 
>>!variablename).

I've updated all my patches to fix this (and added DB's
11/26 fixes for files.c and a few other miscellaneous
fixes to nanomiscbugs2.patch).  There are several cases,
though, where a macro (e. g. ISSET()) returns a value
meant to be treated as boolean, and where a function takes
ints that are interpreted as though they are bools (zero
== behave one way, anything else == behave the other way);
I've left them as is for now.

http://pooka_regent.tripod.com/patches/nano/nanomiscbugs2-patch.txt
http://pooka_regent.tripod.com/patches/nano/nanomiscbugs2a-patch.txt
http://pooka_regent.tripod.com/patches/nano/nanopara-patch.txt


_____________________________________________________________
Sluggy.Net: The Sluggy Freelance Community!

_____________________________________________________________
Select your own custom email address for FREE! Get address@hidden w/No Ads, 
6MB, POP & more! http://www.everyone.net/selectmail?campaign=tag