Re: [Nano-devel] useless include ?

[David Lawrence Ramsey]

Sorry for the delay in responding; I've been busy.

--- Mike Frysinger <address@hidden> wrote:

<snip>

>the first parameter to AC_TRY_RUN() would never be utilized in a 
>cross-compiling scenario ... so if you have nested AC_TRY_RUN()'s in 
>the first param, you can just 'ignore' them ... add the 4th parameter 
>to the first AC_TRY_RUN() and everything should be golden

Okay; thanks for the info.  The fourth parameter of the first 
AC_TRY_RUN() is indeed set in the last patch I sent you (which is now in 
CVS), but the nested AC_TRY_RUN()s are in the second parameter, since 
they're run only if the test in the first parameter fails.  Is that 
golden too?

>personally i dislike slang intensely so i just always disable it :)

I don't like it much myself either.