[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable
From: |
Nick Warne |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:19:05 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9 |
On Sunday 29 January 2006 20:19, David Lawrence Ramsey wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what version of gcc are you using, in case that makes
> any difference? Sorry I can't be of more help.
The one I have always used - I build kernel, KDE, everything on this gcc no
with issues:
gcc version 3.3.4 on Linux 2.6.15
I get this same crash on a box at work, so now I know what causes it here, I
will test again tomorrow - the machine at work is running Linux 2.4.31
Nick
--
"Person who say it cannot be done should not interrupt person doing it."
-Chinese Proverb
- [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/01/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, David Lawrence Ramsey, 2006/01/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable,
Nick Warne <=
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/01/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/01/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Mike Frysinger, 2006/01/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Ken Tyler, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Mike Frysinger, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, David Lawrence Ramsey, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/01/30