[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable
From: |
Nick Warne |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:23:59 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9 |
On Tuesday 31 January 2006 00:05, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i found that i could also reproduce this in Windows by logging in with
> putty, exporting TERM=putty, and then resizing the terminal
> -mike
Well I can get this to segfault easy now, even on opening the test file if I
do not resize the window when it does segfault - if you need to run some
debug code to trace, I am willing to help.
I have looked at the code, but I think you need to be a nano veteran to follow
it - it's a bit awkward to follow for a virgin...
Nick
--
"Person who say it cannot be done should not interrupt person doing it."
-Chinese Proverb
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, (continued)
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Mike Frysinger, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, David Lawrence Ramsey, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Mike Frysinger, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Mike Frysinger, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Mike Frysinger, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable,
Nick Warne <=
Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Mike Frysinger, 2006/01/29