Re: [Nano-devel] updates, and relicensing questions...

[David Ramsey]

On 7/28/07, Jean-Philippe Guérard <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is also true for GPLv3, but the GPLv2 wording was
> targeted at software, not at documentation. While nothing prevents it
> from being used for documentation, I don't think it's a very good
> license for documentation. For a GNU project, I think the GNU Free
> Documentation License would be a better choice.
>
> See: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html

I'll look into this.  I've never really read through the FDL in detail
before, aside from the parts about unmodifiable sections (which I don't
particularly like).