[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Nano-devel] Re: [Info-nano] Nano Feature Request?
From: |
Adam Wysocki via ArcaBit |
Subject: |
[Nano-devel] Re: [Info-nano] Nano Feature Request? |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:29:12 +0200 (CEST) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) |
On Tue, 12 May 2009, Damien Joldersma wrote:
> I would like to have nano, my favorite editor :), to help me handle my
> permission problems. As in, if I open a file that I can't edit - can there
> be some sort of visual cue letting me know that I can't write out the file
> or possibly not even let me either change just read/view or (extreme) not
> even open the file without prompting an "are you sure want to continue
> editing? you won't be able to save" or possibly even a nifty way to
> temporarily gain privleges via a sudo save or something, anything, just so
> long as I don't loose my trivial edits! :D
Hello,
I decided to investigate it a bit more and made a small patch (attached)
that will set the view mode if at least one file can't be written to. It
can be suppressed with (also added) option -y (or --noview).
It's drawbacks however are that:
- flags must be changed to long long (or unsigned long) as there are
all 31 bits used
- see NOTES in access(2) manpage
Feel free to test and use (and maybe even it will make it's way into the
nano source tree?).
Kind regards.
--
Software Development Department, ArcaBit Sp. z o.o.
Ul. Fortuny 9, 01-339 Warszawa, POLAND
nano-autoview.patch.gz
Description: Binary data
- [Nano-devel] Re: [Info-nano] Nano Feature Request?,
Adam Wysocki via ArcaBit <=
Re: [Nano-devel] Re: [Info-nano] Nano Feature Request?, Eitan Adler, 2009/07/27