[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] http://www.nano-editor.org/dist/test/nano-2.3.2pre1.tar
From: |
Eitan Adler |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] http://www.nano-editor.org/dist/test/nano-2.3.2pre1.tar.gz |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Jan 2013 10:40:27 -0500 |
On 3 January 2013 00:46, Chris Allegretta <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >> Also this is a good time to remind me if folks have been maintaining
>> >> downstream things for your distro and you want to push them up; a URL
>> >> is preferred to a giant number of attachments in a private reply :)
>>
> Hmm this is taking a lot longer than I'd have hoped. I'll keep on this as
> it seems like it shouldnt be this hard to figure out... unsure how easy
> fixing the last would be, ideally we'd turn it into a .in file and actually
> generate the path based on the install prefix.
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/nano-devel/2011-11/msg00005.html
>
> err, I see lots of warning wih slang (assuming that's what you meant), it
> seems slang thinks that the string argument to waddnstr is char * but
> ncurses think its const char *. But since you brought it up I fixed some
> other issues with -Wall and -pedantic in r4555
I meant clang - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clang - clang.llvm.org
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/nano-devel/2011-02/msg00005.html
>
> Unable to reproduce with the g++ I tried (gcc version 4.4.5) but I
> introduced new problems with the locking code so I fixed those. r4556
Ack.
> This is likely a release script problem, maybe I should just check all that
> in rather than keep having to find them every time I upgrade desktops....
:)
> Hmm and looks like a few others, but wow this one was pretty blatantly
> wrong. r4560.
>
> Thank you for all your efforts here Eitan and Mike!
And thank you for yours!
--
Eitan Adler