[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability
From: |
Eitan Adler |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Jan 2013 10:27:03 -0500 |
On 13 January 2013 04:26, Joshua Rogers <address@hidden> wrote:
> No problem!
> If it is possible, could a CVE be assigned? If it's not a cmd execution, it
> could atleast be classed as a DoS
To get a CVE assigned email address@hidden with the
name of the program, an explanation of the bug, and a link to the
diff.
--
Eitan Adler
- [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/11
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Chris Allegretta, 2013/01/11
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/11
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Chris Allegretta, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Benno Schulenberg, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability,
Eitan Adler <=
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Mike Frysinger, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Eitan Adler, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Kamil Dudka, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Kamil Dudka, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Kamil Dudka, 2013/01/14