[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Jan 2013 12:58:10 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.7.1; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) |
On Sunday 13 January 2013 10:27:03 Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 13 January 2013 04:26, Joshua Rogers <address@hidden> wrote:
> > No problem!
> > If it is possible, could a CVE be assigned? If it's not a cmd execution,
> > it could atleast be classed as a DoS
>
> To get a CVE assigned email address@hidden with the
> name of the program, an explanation of the bug, and a link to the
> diff.
random bugs that come up in nano dont really ned cves/etc imo. search the
list and tracker -- ive posted many such reports and they arent security
vulns.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/11
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Chris Allegretta, 2013/01/11
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/11
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Chris Allegretta, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Benno Schulenberg, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Eitan Adler, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability,
Mike Frysinger <=
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Eitan Adler, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Kamil Dudka, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Kamil Dudka, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Joshua Rogers, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Kamil Dudka, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] Vulnerability, Mike Frysinger, 2013/01/14