[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] RFC: the content and aspect of the help lines
From: |
Eitan Adler |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] RFC: the content and aspect of the help lines |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Mar 2014 11:52:29 -0400 |
On 17 March 2014 11:23, Richard Kolb II <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Unfortunately as I think you've noticed already it's rather difficult
>> to get feedback from folks as it seems like we have a very silent
>> majority who seem happy with what is offered, so sometimes you have do
>> have to make decisions blindly.
In my case it is a desire to avoid bikeshedding. I trust you enough
to make a good decision that there is no need to provide my personal
preference.
I am likely not alone. ;)
> I can start asking our Twitter
>> followers what they think also - does anyone have a preferred polling
>> software for the web which is Free Software?
LimeSurvey is the survey software I most commonly see used. However I
don't think a poll is required here (and I wonder if it will really
draw more participants). It is FSF-Free but not copyfree.
> I think my default
>> position has been rather conservative on new changes, but if folks are
>> ok with this I think we can make some visual appearance changes in the
>> unstable series and gather feedback in the next stable series cycle.
Perhaps it makes sense to differentiate between whether nano is called
as "nano" or as "pico" ?
> I
>> think even despite our best efforts to communicate them, people can
>> react negatively to what seem like minor changes.
People don't like change when it happens - but they often get used to
it quite fast.
--
Eitan Adler