Re: [Nano-devel] interrupting contiguous cuts with a toggle

[Chris Allegretta]

On 6/13/14, Benno Schulenberg <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014, at 4:04, Chris Allegretta wrote:
>> LGTM (based on quick glance), looks like a nice way to introduce other
>> actions which we may want to allow cutbuffer preservation across.
>
> Okay, patch is in SVN, r4962.
>
> Another obvious candidate for cutbuffer preservation is ^C (current
> cursor position).  And maybe ^G (help) too.  Oh, and M-- and M-=
> (scrolling a line without moving the cursor), of course.  All other
> functions are almost guaranteed to move the cursor -- except when
> cancelled, of course, but that gets maybe a bit too complicated.

Sure, however maintaining a special list of functions to check for may
become unmaintainable.  Maybe we could just check for whether the
function who was just called's subnfunc struct has viewok==TRUE and
use that to determine whether to set the preservation...