Re: [Nano-devel] interrupting contiguous cuts with a toggle

[Mark Majeres]

Benno,

I didn't realize that undo/redo was no longer an option, that's great news.
Without the check for ISSET(UNDOABLE), having the cutbuffer_reset() in
nano.c will negate the call that is made in text.c

I think all the problems you mention about the ^K's and the segfault
can be resolved by leaving the call to cutbuffer_reset() in text.c per
my patch, and instead removing the cutbuffer_reset() from nano.c.
Have you tried this?

--Mark Majeres

On 6/14/14, Benno Schulenberg <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014, at 18:57, Mark Majeres wrote:
>> Have a look at this patch.  The behavior will be different when
>> undo/redo is enabled.
>
> Hmm...  No, this doesn't do anything for me.   A ^C still breaks
> a series of ^Ks and loses the first part of the series.
>
> You will have noticed that since revision 4964 the undo code
> is enabled by default.  Thanks to your work.  :)
>
> Your patch thus adds only a call to cutbuffer_reset() in a place
> that doesn't seem to matter to me.  What I think would be needed
> is that the cutbuffer_reset() routine creates or updates or closes
> an undo item.
>
> Benno