[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] compensating for changed length
|
From: |
Mark Majeres |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] compensating for changed length |
|
Date: |
Sun, 22 Mar 2015 10:30:27 -0700 |
> Now the cursor is on the above g instead of on the s.
> It would be nice if it were still on the s.
>
> Benno
>
Yes, It would be nice. But when performing other actions on
selections, the selection is cleared after the action. It would seem
appropriate to remove the selection after the spell check.
--Mark
- [Nano-devel] after an external spell check, the mark has moved, Benno Schulenberg, 2015/03/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] after an external spell check, the mark has moved, Mark Majeres, 2015/03/15
- Re: [Nano-devel] after an external spell check, the mark has moved, Benno Schulenberg, 2015/03/17
- Re: [Nano-devel] after an external spell check, the mark has moved, Mark Majeres, 2015/03/17
- Re: [Nano-devel] after an external spell check, the mark has moved, Benno Schulenberg, 2015/03/19
- Re: [Nano-devel] after an external spell check, the mark has moved, Mark Majeres, 2015/03/20
- Re: [Nano-devel] after an external spell check, the mark has moved, Benno Schulenberg, 2015/03/21
- Re: [Nano-devel] after an external spell check, the mark has moved, Mark Majeres, 2015/03/21
- [Nano-devel] compensating for changed length, Benno Schulenberg, 2015/03/21
- Re: [Nano-devel] compensating for changed length,
Mark Majeres <=
- [Nano-devel] should a spell check clear the marked selection?, Benno Schulenberg, 2015/03/23
- Re: [Nano-devel] should a spell check clear the marked selection?, Mark Majeres, 2015/03/25
- Re: [Nano-devel] should a spell check clear the marked selection?, Benno Schulenberg, 2015/03/26
- [Nano-devel] compensating for changed length, Benno Schulenberg, 2015/03/27
- Re: [Nano-devel] compensating for changed length, Mark Majeres, 2015/03/27