[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo
From: |
Chris Allegretta |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:30:52 -0500 |
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Benno Schulenberg
<address@hidden> wrote:
> The sooner the better. And I'd like to start moving to gnulib,
I think it makes sense to do what was previously discussed, put the
gnulib changes into 2.5 and then once we have all the features we're
going to need for awhile, brand that 2.6.
> and to properly register Mike as the author of those patches,
> we need git.
Sorry, why is that? We have AUTHORS for recognizing significant
contributions to the codebase. I thought Mike already had access to
the repo; just made it so he does.
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/03/06
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Chris Allegretta, 2016/03/07
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/03/07
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo,
Chris Allegretta <=
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Mike Frysinger, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Jordi Mallach, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Chris Allegretta, 2016/03/10
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Chris Allegretta, 2016/03/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Mike Frysinger, 2016/03/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Jordi Mallach, 2016/03/30