[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo
From: |
Benno Schulenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Mar 2016 10:58:29 +0100 |
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016, at 08:35, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> I'm unsure we need to stitch the switch to git to a nice version
> number. gnulib and git are both implementation details of nano, not
> actual front-end, user oriented bits that are going to be noticed
Precisely.
> In fact, after the gnulib change, nano will be mostly the
> same binary, right?
Right.
> Should we stop committing ChangeLog entries and get a ChangeLog
> generated from git history?
Yes, please. Gnulib has a module for that too. Generate
the Changelog at 'make dist' time.
Benno
--
http://www.fastmail.com - The professional email service
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/03/06
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Chris Allegretta, 2016/03/07
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/03/07
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Chris Allegretta, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Mike Frysinger, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Jordi Mallach, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo,
Benno Schulenberg <=
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Chris Allegretta, 2016/03/10
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Chris Allegretta, 2016/03/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Mike Frysinger, 2016/03/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Jordi Mallach, 2016/03/30