Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo

[Richard Kolb II]

I would have to agree, it would also stop any potential bug reports of sometime pulling SVN, trying to build, and then complaining a feature that as added didn't show up.

Richard Kolb II

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Chris Allegretta <address@hidden> wrote:

I do feel like we should remove all the files actually, no point in
having a dead repo sitting around.  I think checking out trunk from
SVN should just produce a README which says to go use git.  If people
have local changes, presumably trying to SVN up would produce a
conflict and not delete their changes.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Mike Frysinger <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 04 Apr 2016 20:51, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016, at 04:15, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > they've removed the old git repo and i've pushed up my copy now.
>> > feel free to make any announcements.
>>
>> Should we also make a final commit to SVN, to say that development
>> has moved to git and the SVN repo is dead / abandoned / left as a
>> monument?
>
> makes sense to me.  could add a flag file like '!!MOVED-TO-GIT' or
> update the configure file to use AC_MSG_ERROR([moved to git]).  i
> don't think we'd want to delete all the files.
> -mike

_______________________________________________
Nano-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nano-devel