Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo

[Kamil Dudka]

On Monday, April 04, 2016 15:24:53 Chris Allegretta wrote:
> I do feel like we should remove all the files actually, no point in
> having a dead repo sitting around.  I think checking out trunk from
> SVN should just produce a README which says to go use git.

+1

Kamil

> If people
> have local changes, presumably trying to SVN up would produce a
> conflict and not delete their changes.
> 
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Mike Frysinger <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On 04 Apr 2016 20:51, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> >> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016, at 04:15, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> > they've removed the old git repo and i've pushed up my copy now.
> >> > feel free to make any announcements.
> >> 
> >> Should we also make a final commit to SVN, to say that development
> >> has moved to git and the SVN repo is dead / abandoned / left as a
> >> monument?
> > 
> > makes sense to me.  could add a flag file like '!!MOVED-TO-GIT' or
> > update the configure file to use AC_MSG_ERROR([moved to git]).  i
> > don't think we'd want to delete all the files.
> > -mike