Re: [Nel] Licensing Issue

[James Sanders]

As an amendment, if the server is not distributed, is it therefore not 
covered under the GPL and can be closed source? Not trying to be difficult, 
just curious. Thanks again.
James


> From: "James Sanders" <address@hidden>
> Reply-To: address@hidden
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [Nel] Licensing Issue
> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 19:28:28 -0800
>
> Hello,
>     I have a question. Lets say I wrote a killer MMPOG with Nel and I
> became a hit, not that that would happen, just hypothetically :). Now,
> because this isn't a perfect world, what keeps a user from just recompiling
> the code with for instance wireframing enabled to give himself an unfair
> advantage over the other users. This is a real possibility with GPL. My
> question is, are there any alternative licenses available? E.g., pay or
> profit sharing in return for a closed source license. Just wondering.
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://www.nevrax.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nel


_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com