[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] PATCH: `repl -annotate` broken in 1.1RC{2,3}
From: |
Christer Boräng |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] PATCH: `repl -annotate` broken in 1.1RC{2,3} |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Oct 2004 11:57:59 +0200 |
In message <address@hidden>, Gurusamy Sarath
y writes:
>After upgrading from 1.0.4 to 1.1-RC3, I've noticed that I don't
>get any "Replied" headers in mail that I've responded to, and
>hence no corresponding visual hint (the "dash") in the scan output.
>This seems to happen because the annotate() function has grown
>a couple of new arguments, but these weren't being set correctly
>enough to get the old behavior.
>That attached patch cured the problem for me.
Thanks, this patch worked great. I've been without annotation since
May, but now I finally have it again. :-)
//Christer
--
| Sys admin @ MEDIC WWW: http://www.dtek.chalmers.se/ |
| Email: address@hidden Phone: (0)31 772 5431, (0)707 53 57 57 |
"I fought the loa and the loa won, I fought the loa and the loa won..."
-- Dave Aronsson, a.s.r.
- [Nmh-workers] PATCH: `repl -annotate` broken in 1.1RC{2,3}, Gurusamy Sarathy, 2004/10/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] PATCH: `repl -annotate` broken in 1.1RC{2,3},
Christer Boräng <=
- [Nmh-workers] nmh updates, Jon Steinhart, 2004/10/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh updates, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2004/10/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh updates, Oliver Kiddle, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh updates, Ken Hornstein, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh updates, Jon Steinhart, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh updates, Ken Hornstein, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh updates, Jon Steinhart, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh updates, Michael Richardson, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh updates, Ken Hornstein, 2004/10/13