[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions
From: |
Joel Reicher |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jul 2006 07:25:45 +1000 |
> Based on the recent emails, I am thinking about a small modification
> to sendfile() in whatnowsbr.c. This change would be to skip the test
> for automimeproc if attach (in Whatnow(), would have to be made global)
> is set.
I'm not entirely sure what you mean in code terms, but I'd much prefer it
if automimeproc and attach were handled in the same place, and that this
test could be an || of them.
Cheers,
- Joel
- [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Jon Steinhart, 2006/07/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions,
Joel Reicher <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Jon Steinhart, 2006/07/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Joel Reicher, 2006/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Jon Steinhart, 2006/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Norman Shapiro, 2006/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Joel Reicher, 2006/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Norman Shapiro, 2006/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Robert Elz, 2006/07/19