[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] MIME questions, and followup to my earlier email
From: |
Earl Hood |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] MIME questions, and followup to my earlier email |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Nov 2010 22:36:57 -0600 |
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Jon Steinhart wrote:
> I haven't paid attention to mail standards in a long time. Is RFC 2231
> a happening thing? Do we need to go through the trouble of supporting it?
I have support for 2184 (which 2231 updates) in my
OSS Perl program, but mainly when dealing with attachment
data where is seems to be of most practical use.
I think several MUAs support it, but unsure about the
ones used by most people (e.g. Outlook).
I've seen the use of non-ASCII encoding defined in RFC 2047
inside of parameter values, which is not valid, but is likely
that MUAs are supporting such abuse due to developers
misunderstanding the MIME RFCs. I do not recommend nmh
even try to deal with such data.
IMO, if there is motivation to provide more robust MIME
handling in nmh, I think it would be a mistake to not
support 2231.
--ewh