Re: [Nmh-workers] Understanding nmh (aka. What's the goal) [really non-ASCII message bodies ]

[Peter Maydell]

Ken Hornstein wrote:
>>That's what (as I understand it) Jon's patch handles (I still use the
>>latest released version of nmh, which predates all this stuff ... there
>>hasn't been a new release (since 1.3) for a long time now...) and makes a
>>standards conforming message.
>
>You know, this has been bugging me.  Should we cut a new release?  I kinda
>think it's long-overdue.
>
>I'm thinking that what we have now (modulo any autoconf cleanup, which
>I've been itching to work on) should be 1.4, and whatever comes out of
>this MIME discussion should be post-1.4.  Or do people want to include
>this new MIME work?

Has there been much of interest gone in since 1.3 to merit a 1.4?

I certainly agree that this MIME rework should be either all in the
next release or not in it at all -- we don't want to accidentally
release half-a-change.

I did the 'turn handle, release nmh' work last time round but I'm
currently horribly busy so am unlikely to be able to do that before
next year. If somebody else is willing to do it I don't object.

-- PMM