[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
fun (was Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results)
From: |
Paul Vixie |
Subject: |
fun (was Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results) |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Feb 2011 21:02:22 +0000 |
ok so if there's no disk cache contention and the ~/Mail/inbox/mhindex.db
file remains readable in disk cache, "scan" can finish in less than 1 second.
#nsa:amd64# time sh -c "./scan +inbox > /tmp/vix2"
0.184u 0.245s 0:00.43 97.6% 144+1355k 0+1io 0pf+0w
#nsa:amd64# time sh -c "./scan +inbox > /tmp/vix2"
0.156u 0.208s 0:00.36 97.2% 148+1437k 0+1io 0pf+0w
#nsa:amd64# time sh -c "./scan +inbox > /tmp/vix2"
0.144u 0.227s 0:00.37 97.2% 147+1426k 0+1io 0pf+0w
#nsa:amd64# wc -l /tmp/vix2
3293 /tmp/vix2
this is after fixing a bug where i was calling fstat() on the message file
even though i wasn't reading from the message file. these results are now
interesting.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results, Earl Hood, 2011/02/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results, Paul Vixie, 2011/02/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results, Paul Vixie, 2011/02/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2011/02/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results, Paul Vixie, 2011/02/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2011/02/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results, Ken Hornstein, 2011/02/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results, Paul Vixie, 2011/02/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results, Ken Hornstein, 2011/02/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results, Paul Vixie, 2011/02/15
fun (was Re: [Nmh-workers] some indexing results),
Paul Vixie <=