Re: [Nmh-workers] Handling non-ASCII

[Lyndon Nerenberg]

On 2012-04-16, at 10:22 AM, Ken Hornstein wrote:

> Hm.  I see your point, but I'm sort of torn here.  Do we care about
> obscuring the surrounding text?  I mean, the original bug report
> came as the result of a spam message; I don't think this is a problem
> in the normal case, is it?  To me "?" more indicates something went
> wrong than "." (and U+FFFD means that even more).

If the only source of these malformed messages is spam then we should just 
refuse to display them.