[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Apr 2012 19:44:13 -0700 |
On 2012-04-29, at 7:33 PM, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> But then you say (in another message) that you want nmh programs
> to not deadlock under our hypothetical nmhlock program ... so you
> want to run nmh programs under nmhlock? Or you want the option to
> handle both nmh and non-nmh programs under nmhlock? I am just
> trying to understand what you want.
There is no transaction locking under (n)mh, just like there is no transaction
locking under general UNIX shell commands.
MH lets us play, and it lets us break things. C'est la vie.
--lyndon
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, norm, 2012/04/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/04/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, Ken Hornstein, 2012/04/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, norm, 2012/04/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2012/04/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, norm, 2012/04/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, norm, 2012/04/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, Ken Hornstein, 2012/04/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, norm, 2012/04/28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, Ken Hornstein, 2012/04/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking,
Lyndon Nerenberg <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, David Levine, 2012/04/26
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, David Levine, 2012/04/26
Re: [Nmh-workers] Locking In Scripts and nmh Locking, David Levine, 2012/04/26