[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3
|
From: |
paul vixie |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3 |
|
Date: |
Thu, 07 Jun 2012 01:04:52 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 |
On 6/6/2012 11:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> ... [ some experimenting later ... ] What it appears to be doing is
> filling the buffer to the specified length and then returning -1
> anyway. Given your argument that there is no reason for it to fail, I
> suppose the quickest hack is to assume that -1 means the same as
> "buffer filled". regards, tom lane
or we could just say, link against some library that provides a
reasonable snprintf that follows posix?
- [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Tom Lane, 2012/06/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Tom Lane, 2012/06/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Tom Lane, 2012/06/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Tom Lane, 2012/06/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3,
paul vixie <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/06/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, valdis . kletnieks, 2012/06/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, paul vixie, 2012/06/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, Tom Lane, 2012/06/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] scan -width behaves oddly in 1.5RC3, paul vixie, 2012/06/06